Pt 980 P 48 An Appreciation of the judgment of HM King Charles III 's Privy Council Case Dayal v Jugnauth, of Const 8 , UKPC 37 Privy Council Appeal No 0006 of 2023 namely Pg 21, s 55. ‘… (i) The proposals were made in open and public, allowing criticism and debate’ . and … (xii) There was no finding that the proposals were unreasonable or that they carried any element of deception and/or extreme exaggeration.’ Some internal mutiny did not succeed and PC did not overturn a Supreme court decision. When I look at Const 18 QB , I said their battle was already half lost. At the first instance itself the Dayal Clan should not have been allowed to go to the Slaughterhouse.